Research on Intellectual Property Rights of Generative Artificial

Abstract

This article, against the backdrop of the development of generative artificial intelligence technology, focuses on the copyright protection of AI-generated works, systematically exploring their legal attribute definition, rights ownership disputes, and judicial practice dilemmas. In the face of the current legislative vacuum in the field of intellectual property protection for generative artificial intelligence in China and the chaotic standards in judicial practice, by analyzing typical cases such as the Filing v. Baidu case and Tencent v. Yingxun case, it proposes a theoretical framework of "tool attribute - user rights", advocating for the establishment of a system rule that prioritizes contracts and takes the substantive contributor as the rights subject. The research suggests promoting legislative innovation from three dimensions: improving the criteria for originality judgment, setting up reasonable use exceptions, and building a hierarchical protection system, to provide a Chinese solution for intellectual property governance in the AI era.